My long-form investigations on Nutralis. Each article was reviewed, cross-checked, and submitted to a lawyer before publication. Except the last one — that one, you'll decide with me.
Backed by internal documents, I trace the decision chain that let Nutralis keep selling products known to be non-compliant since February 2025. Six executives named.
A €240,000 transfer routed through a Swiss foundation, followed by a complete editorial reversal. Three-part investigation into food-industry lobbying and the quiet corruption of French civil society.
In four years, more than 1,800 children were enrolled — without informed parental consent — in school-based "taste panels". Internal memos, contracts with school authorities, teacher testimonies.
A redacted version was published. The original — which I was able to consult — already pointed to five major risks in the preservatives used by Nutralis. Full line-by-line reconstruction.
I tracked down two jurors. Their accounts converge: pressure, intimidation, identity leaks. Prosecutors never followed up on their reports. Judicial reconstruction, sources named with their consent.
▸ Do not log out the session. Do not share these credentials with anyone.
Dr. XXXXXXX had submitted on February 15, 2026 an internal report linking three deaths directly to the contamination of XXXXXXXX products. Six weeks later, his body was found in his car, near Lyon. The investigation concluded it was a XXXXXXXX. The documents I obtained tell another story — one of a XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX orchestrated by XXXXX XXXXXXXX, Nutralis executive vice-president…
[…read the remaining 4,200 words]
Warning. Publishing this text exposes me to immediate prosecution. Three cited witnesses wish to remain anonymous. If I put it online, I probably won't go home tonight. The decision is yours.
Only one action possible · no going back